"Whisperings of Love." William Adolphe Bouguereau. 1889.I saw this painting at
the Joslyn in Omaha as part of a traveling exhibition of work rescued from New Orleans after Katrina. I hate to even show this image because it is such poor quality and the original size of the painting is huge--life-size at least.
I returned to this particular painting (and a Robert Henri one) several times throughout the afternoon. I still keep a picture of it on my computer and look at it frequently. It is perhaps the most beautiful painting I've ever seen--I would rank it with
Canova's Cupid and Psyche as the most transfixingly wonderous works of art I've ever seen.
The composition is perfectly balanced yet with enough subtle variety to keep your eye moving. The coloring (which you can't see here) is detailed and finely rendered. The figures threaten to leap into the world. And yet the woman's face is shadowed, the light coming from behind her--it gives a haunting feel, perhaps it feels like a visual whisper.
Although Bouguereau was famous in his day, he was attacked by the avant-garde as the artist that exemplified everything wrong with Academy painting. You will find him in museums if you look, but for a long time he was lost behind the canonical history of Modern Ar

t. (You will be surprised at how few books there are on him.) To be the last great master of a tradition in the Modern era is to have really no value
at all. And perhaps, for that reason most of all, I always give extra time to him when I see his work. (The Art Institute has "The Bathers" (right) which is also a beautiful composition.)
I think what adds to the wonder of this painting, strangely enough, is that no one is doing work like this today--and that no one could. Bouguereau was immersed in and trained by an industry that no longer exists. There is a level of oral tradition and physical imitation (looking at a painter laying down paint and then copying him) that is inaccessible to us now. Some things can be conjectured but Bouguereau's paintings are now truly priceless.
Personally, I am bothered by my own love of this painting. Do I love work like this (and Canova's) because they are beautiful women? Would I love it as much if it wasn't a woman? Does a work even as modest as this objectify women? Is it "okay" to love this painting--even though it has a cherub in it? Am I shallow for loving a work that has no apparent theoretical underpinnings, carries no secrets, is not subversive in any way? Should I ignore the unbearably sweet, sentimental emotions that stir in me before this painting as so much silliness?